Footnote 10 As suggested because of the fairly low overall IHP mean score ( Table 3), participants generally speaking expressed good emotions about their intimate orientation identification. Certainly, just 6% of participants manifested a general pattern of contract with statements expressing negative emotions about one’s orientation that is sexuali.e., scored 4 or greater). The degree that is greatest of identification distancing had been seen among bisexual males, whom scored notably greater than lesbians but whose mean rating had been nonetheless underneath the hypothetical midpoint associated with scale. Footnote 11
The 2 things evaluating community recognition are not considerably intercorrelated (r = в€’۰٫۰۹) and therefore had been analyzed separately. As shown in dining dining Table 3, a lot of participants agreed that their account within the intimate minority community had little related to how they felt about on their own, and less than half considered their community account to be a significant representation of by themselves. These patterns had been various across subgroups, but, with lesbians and homosexual males showing more powerful recognition using the intimate minority community than bisexuals ( dining dining dining Table 3).
Option about Sexual Orientation
Overall, participants stated that they didn’t experience their orientation that is sexual as option.
